|
|
Editor's view n°1:
The very medium level of IT security
IT security is boring. It makes me feel incompetent. Since
15 last years, I have seen new and complex tools, quite new requirements
and means for security from the board of vice-presidents, and
this is good. But I have seen more and more complicated security
issues in large systems with more products, more connections,
more evolutions, and this is very bad.
The bitter pill to swallow is: today, in a classical IT system
used by a corporate company, nobody controls the security. I
mean, nobody knows if all risks are reasonably managed, and even,
nobody knows all the actual risks applicable to the system.
And don't say that solutions are in tools, or even in a controlled
process. The stuff is too complex, too fast, too unstable, too
obscure. As said a famous humorist: we are too stupid for this
sophisticated world ! (Yes, we make it)
As usual, man is the hope. The classical solutions today are:
- 'omerta': silent about the malicious intents which are pointed
out in the IT system of the company,
- fear or honesty: it is easy to find skilled technician people,
to pay them quite well. Then, numerous technicians should avoid
to take any risk, even if the fraud seems easy to do.
- complexity, speed, instability and obscurity in the system:
they product the risks, but they worry the bad gays too, when
they plan an attack !
With tools and controlled processes, all that stuff has a
true, but only medium effectiveness. Not enough for example in
a large scale system with numerous B to B connections and fast
evolutions, web services and so on.
I see a long-term solution: more collective intelligence,
more technical qualification, more managerial consciousness.
We have no chance to improve the security of large interconnected
systems without improving our human skills.
It will be slow. It is not a business for tools providers.
Rather a burden, when they will have to prove that their tools
are structured to be hacker-proof. It is a small market for consultants,
and a hard work for the IT team in each company. It requests
innovation, new educational methods in IT security. Here is a
priority.
We have to develop now honest and collective intelligence
against malicious and personal intelligence. It was as the status
of quality and safety in the industrial companies in the 1980's,
and they succeeded in managing these challenges. I am absolutely
optimistic.
But in any case, ecommerce and B to B systems will provide
doubtful security during the ten next years, in spite of numerous
advertisements which promise us the moon. We will have to keep
our consciousness about the real issues, to train everyone, to
select simple and sound tools, clear and robust processes, and
so, to try to build up the next IT systems more cleverly. Good
luck ! |